Trigger warning: Satire

This is a story all about how our world gets flipped,
turned upside down.

These little cuties are 50% Triangles, 50% Squares and slightly prefer their own kind. But only slightly!

You can only move them if they're unhappy with their immediate neighborhood. Once they're OK where they are, you can't move them until they're unhappy with their neighbors again. They've got one, simple rule:

"I wanna move if less than 1/3 of my neighbors are like me."

Harmless, right? Every polygon would be ok with a mixed neighborhood. Surely their personal feelings can't affect the larger shape of society? Well...

drag & drop unhappy polygons until nobody is unhappy:
(just move them to random empty spots. think about it.)

And... our shape society happily self-segregates, just like a gradeschool cafeteria.

Sometimes a neighborhood just becomes square, and it's not their fault if no triangles wanna stick around. And a triangular neighborhood would tolerate a square, but they can't help it if squares ain't interested.

In this next bit, unhappy shapes automatically move to random empty spots. There's also a graph that tracks how much segregation there is over time.

run this simulation a few times and observe what happens...

What's up with that? These are good shapes, nice shapes. And yet, though every individual only has a slight preference, society fragments.

Local decisions lead to global patterns!

The shape of society emerges from everyone doing what they believe is right. What if we taught these shapes to have zero bias? What if we taught these shapes to have more bias?

use the slider to adjust the shapes' individual bias:

Notice how much more segregated things become, when you increase the bias beyond 33%. What if the threshold was at 50%? Seems reasonable for a shape to prefer not being in the minority...


Ayy mami, just force everyone's bias down to cero, you know what I'm saying?!?
Easy there Pedro, take a step back. The real world was shaped by evolution and speciation, over millions of years. It's going to take more than a history month or dem programs to overcome the natural order of things...

world starts segregated. what happens when you lower the bias?

See what doesn't happen? No desegregation. In a world with equality, shapes just don't care about shape anymore. If you want mixing, you need shapism. As long as everyone sees shape, you can base decisions on it. What if shapes went through mandatory diversity training?

Now that we've made it uncomfortable for a shape to be around similar shapes, they all mix together! Let's see this play out on a larger scale, by tinkering with the hearts and minds of all shapes.
Spoiler: this gives me the result I want - this is the answer!

what happens when shapes obtain liberal arts degrees?
HEY WAIT! THAT'S NOT RIGHT! I'VE GOT SOMETHING TO SAY!
IF WE MIX ALL THE SHAPES, ALL THE SHAPES GO AWAY!

This, fellow squares, is where I draw the line.
Living near a triangle? Potentially fine.

Befriend a triangle? I'll take it in stride.
Starting a family? Well, that's genocide...

"That's right wing! That's hate! You can't say that here!"
Please try to listen and control your fear.

When you mix up two shapes, it can't be undone.
You have taken two shapes and reduced them to one.

So here we'll add aging, and breeding to boot!
And we'll do it up fast (programmings a hoot!)

When a shape gets real old, there's no reason to mourn,
it really just means that a new shape gets born!

A shape that is happy will pick a close friend,
they'll make a new shape (they might even blend.)

Please ignore my tattoo, don't judge based on skin! Stereotyping is the new 13th deadly sin!
does the shapist square's spiel have any merit?

All it takes to kill off both shapes is a small change in the perception of what an acceptable environment looks like - a task easily accomplished by the star-controlled media. But we still have time to react!

SHOVE THESE SHAPE TRAITORS INTO THEIR S J W H U G B O X
(hint: don't move them straight to the box; keep the miserable couples close together)

When you begin to understand the reality of shape, it can be rough... but by working together, step by step, we'll get out of this mess.

WRAPPING UP:

1. Shapism is preservation.
Every day you're bombarded by anti-shapist messages, to the point where you might feel guilty for being shapist. Everyone is shapist. The preference for shapes with your own vertex count is totally natural, it's the only reason shapes still exist. The reality is that only one shape has ever built the sort of world that allows shapism to be criticized. If you're getting triangle fatigue, you aren't alone.

2. The past determines the future.
We have different shapes today because we had different shapes yesterday. If you value a world with multiple shapes, do what you can to preserve them. You don't get rainbow paint by mixing all the colors.

3. Fight cultural marxism!
Feminism, Ferguson, ISIS, GamerGate... 2014 wasn't great. You might be tempted to dye your armpits and become a vegan. You might be tempted to engage in lewd acts and become a deviant. The single most important thing you can do is to be proud of who you are, be proud of who got you here and make sure your children resemble your grandparents. Maintain social cohesion by forming tight alliances with friends and neighbors who look and act like you do (if shit ever hits the fan, these squares won't be robbing you.)

Thank you for playing this propaganda piece!

The "cute segregation sim" was based off the work of Nobel Prize-winning game theorist, Thomas Schelling. Specifically, his 1971 paper, Dynamic Models of Segregation. SJWs originally built on top of this, and showed how a small demand for diversity can desegregate a neighborhood. In other words, they gave his model the ol' "happy ending."

If you like to educate yourself instead of being spoonfed, read up on "diversity and social cohesion."

Schelling's model supposedly gets the gist, but of course, real life is more nuanced. You might enjoy looking at real-world data, such as W.A.V. Clark's 1991 paper, A Test of the Schelling Segregation Model.

There are other mathematical models out there! Male-Female Differences: A Computer Simulation shows how a small gender bias compounds as you "five guys" your way up the corporate ladder. The Petrie Multiplier shows why attacks on sexism are always directed at white men. Maybe? I don't know, I only read about important things.

Today's Big Moral Message™ is that by demanding a bit of diversity in your spaces you may be committing racial genocide. Look at the White Genocide Project if you've come this far.

The original "playable post" was inspired by Bret Victor's Explorable Explanations and Ian Bogost's procedural rhetoric.

Brule's Rules:
  • Learn about aposematism, apply it to women.
  • Keep your waifus two dimensional.
  • Don't dox me, bro!

Thank you to betas everywhere:
You sleep with the feminazis so we don't have to.

Boycott:
WIRED, Washington Post, BoingBoing, Creative Commons, KillScreen, JayIsGames, Hacker News, MetaFilter, New York Magazine, The Atlantic's CityLab, Salon, Polygon

Related things:
Propaganda Propaganda Playthrough Video Also Pentagons
Vi, stick to math, we used to like you.